^-A ⁺A

Laboratoire de recherche vasculaire translationnelle

LVTS

Tutelles >

Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7

UFR de rattachement >

UFR Médecine

Label unité >

UMRS

Partenaires >

INSERM, Université Paris 13

Présentation

Le Laboratoire de Recherche Vasculaire Translationnelle (Laboratory for Vascular Translational Science - LVTS) est associé à l’Inserm, à l’Université Paris Diderot, et l’Université Paris 13. Il est identifié comme UMRS 1148.

Avec 5 équipes, le laboratoire d’environ 150 personnes a une approche transdisciplinaire avec les objectifs de lutte contre les pathologies vasculaires. Les équipes sont affiliées à 3 ITMO (CMN, TS, IHP), à plusieurs Ecoles doctorales du PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, et à 2 sections scientifiques de l'Inserm (CSS4 et CSS8).

Pour mener à bien ces projets, les compétences humaines et technologiques comprennent les bases de données cliniques, enquêtes cliniques translationnelles (sténose carotidienne, anévrisme et dissections de l'aorte ascendante, Biocore ), bases de données de tissus humains et de cellules, de nombreux modèles expérimentaux de la maladie (souris transgéniques, rats , lapins), des méthodes de biologie moléculaire et cellulaire (génétique et épigénétique, protéomique, ingénierie des protéines, cytométrie en flux), la chimie des biopolymères, l’élaboration de biomatériaux et nanosystèmes, et les technologies d'imagerie chez les petits animaux et chez l'homme (imagerie nucléaire, ultrasons et IRM).

Equipes de recherche

Le projet est structuré en 5 équipes. Les objectifs mettent en évidence la complémentarité des équipes et des interfaces existantes autour d'un thème structurant sur le coeur et les vaisseaux.

Equipe 1 : " Biologie de l'athérothrombose" (chef d'équipe : A Nicoletti) - voir aussi l'UFR Sciences du Vivant
Equipe 2 : "Maladies structurelles cardiovasculaires" (chef d'équipe : C Boileau & G Jondeau)
Equipe 3 : "Bio-ingénierie cardiovasculaire" (chef d'équipe : D Letourneur)
Equipe 4 : " Imagerie cardiovasculaire" (chef d'équipe : D Le Guludec)
Equipe 5 : "Maladies athérothrombotiques du coeur et du cerveau" (chef d'équipe : G Steg)

[hal-01120417] What do French patients and geneticists think about prenatal and preimplantation diagnoses in Marfan syndrome?

Date: 22 oct 2020 - 16:44

Desc: Marfan syndrome (MFS) is an autosomal dominant connective tissue disorder with manifestations mainly involving the skeletal, ocular, and cardiovascular systems. The phenotypic variability observed in MFS makes genetic counselling difficult. Prenatal diagnosis (PND) and preimplantation genetic diagnosis are technically feasible when a causal mutation is identified, but both raise many ethical questions in this condition. Little is known about opinions and practices in such reproductive issues in MFS. The goal of this study was to report on patients' points of view and geneticists' standard practices. Two different questionnaires were produced. Fifty geneticists filled in the questionnaire. Twenty-two per cent thought that PND was acceptable, 72% debatable and 6% not acceptable. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis was more often reported acceptable (34% of answers). Results varied according to the physician's experience with the disease. Fifty-four answers were collected for patients' questionnaires. Most of them (74%) were favourable to the development of prenatal testing, and believed that the choice should be given to parents. However, only a minority would opt for prenatal diagnosis for themselves. This study showed that the majority of patients were in favour of PND and that opinions among practitioners varied widely, but that overall, practitioners favoured a systematic multidisciplinary evaluation of the couple's request.

[hal-02350851] Impact de la chlorhexidine et de la température sur la production des curli chez Escherichia coli : conséquence sur sa capacité d’adhésion

Date: 22 oct 2020 - 16:04

Desc: [...]

[hal-02052876] Anti-thrombotic properties of a CD31-derived peptide coated on a surface

Date: 22 oct 2020 - 04:19

Desc: [...]

[hal-01809407] Management of direct oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing elective surgeries and invasive procedures: Updated guidelines from the French Working Group on Perioperative Hemostasis (GIHP) – September 2015

Date: 21 oct 2020 - 04:41

Desc: Since 2011, data on patients exposed to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) while undergoing invasive procedures have accumulated. At the same time, an increased hemorrhagic risk during perioperative bridging anticoagulation without thrombotic risk reduction has been demonstrated. This has led the GIHP to update their guidelines published in 2011. For scheduled procedures at low bleeding risk, it is suggested that patients interrupt DOAs the night before irrespective of type of drug and to resume therapy six hours or more after the end of the invasive procedure. For invasive procedures at high bleeding risk, it is suggested to interrupt rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban three days before. Dabigatran should be interrupted according to the renal function, four days and five days if creatinine clearance is higher than 50mL/min and between 30 and 50mL/min, respectively. For invasive procedures at very high bleeding risk such as intracranial neurosurgery or neuraxial anesthesia, longer interruption times are suggested. Finally, bridging with parenteral anticoagulation and measurement of DOA concentrations can no longer routinely be used.

[hal-02293653] Five-year outcomes following timely primary percutaneous intervention, late primary percutaneous intervention, or a pharmaco-invasive strategy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the FAST-MI programme

Date: 21 oct 2020 - 04:41

Desc: AIMS : ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) guidelines recommend primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) as the default reperfusion strategy when feasible ≤120 min of diagnostic ECG, and a pharmaco-invasive strategy otherwise. There is, however, a lack of direct evidence to support the guidelines, and in real-world situations, pPCI is often performed beyond recommended timelines. To assess 5-year outcomes according to timing of pPCI (timely vs. late) compared with a pharmaco-invasive strategy (fibrinolysis with referral to PCI centre). METHODS AND RESULTS : The French registry of Acute ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) programme consists of nationwide observational surveys consecutively recruiting patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction every 5 years. Among the 4250 STEMI patients in the 2005 and 2010 cohorts, those with reperfusion therapy and onset-to-first call time <12 h (n = 2942) were included. Outcomes at 5 years were compared according to type of reperfusion strategy and timing of pPCI, using Cox multivariable analyses and propensity score matching. Among those, 1288 (54%) patients had timely pPCI (≤120 min from ECG), 830 (28%) late pPCI (>120 min), and 824 (28%) intravenous fibrinolysis. Five-year survival was higher with a pharmaco-invasive strategy (89.8%) compared with late pPCI [79.5%; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.51; 1.13-2.02] and similar to timely pPCI (88.2%, adjusted HR 1.02; 0.75-1.38). Concordant results were observed in propensity score-matched cohorts and for event-free survival. CONCLUSION : A substantial proportion of patients have pPCI beyond recommended timelines. As foreseen by the guidelines, these patients have poorer 5-year outcomes, compared with a pharmaco-invasive strategy.